Sleep quality and executive function in a diverse sample of healthy young adults.

Few studies examine the relationship between sleep and executive function in diverse samples of young adults. Our research aims to fill this gap by analyzing how self-reported sleep quality is related to informant-rated executive function as a whole and its working memory component in a diverse sample of 29 healthy college students. Using the self-report measure, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), we divided our sample into two groups based on cutoff criteria (score ≥5: poor sleep): good sleep quality (n = 11) and poor sleep quality (n = 18). Participants were on average 20.86 years old. Informants rated participants' executive functioning and working memory using the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Individuals in the poor sleep quality group were reported as having significantly worse executive function and working memory scores. Young adult college students who report less than 7 hours of sleep per night have lower scores on informant measures of working memory and executive function. This study raises awareness about how self-reported sleep experiences are related to other's observation of cognitive abilities in everyday life in a diverse young adult sample.

A Systematic Review of Host Genomic Variation and Neuropsychological Outcomes for Pediatric Cancer Survivors.

Pediatric survivors of brain tumors and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk for long-term deficits in their neuropsychological functioning. Researchers have begun examining associations between germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which interact with cancer treatment, and neuropsychological outcomes. This review synthesizes the impact of treatment-related toxicity from germline SNPs by neuropsychological domain (i.e., working memory, processing speed, psychological functioning) in pediatric survivors. By focusing on specific neuropsychological domains, this review will examine outcome measurement and critique methodology. Fourteen studies were identified and included in this review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). All studies were published in peer-reviewed journals in English by November 24th, 2021. Reviewed studies were not of sufficient quality for a meta-analysis due to varying measurement strategies, gaps in reported descriptive variables, and low power. All neuropsychological domains evaluated in this review had associations with SNPs, except fine motor and visual integration abilities. Only five SNPs had consistent neuropsychological findings in more than one study or cohort. Future research and replication studies should use validated measures of discrete skills that are central to empirically validated models of survivors' long-term outcomes (i.e., attention, working memory, processing speed). Researchers should examine SNPs across pathophysiological pathways to investigate additive genetic risk in pediatric cancer survivors. Two SNPs were identified that confer resiliency in neuropsychological functioning, and future work should investigate resiliency genotypes and their underlying biological mechanisms.

MTHFR single nucleotide polymorphism associated with working memory in pediatric medulloblastoma survivors.

Background: Associations have been found between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MTHFR gene and cognitive outcomes in cancer survivors. Prior research has demonstrated that the presence of MTHFR SNPs (rs1801131 and rs1801133) in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) corresponds to impairments in attention and executive functioning. The current study examines the associations between rs1801131 and/or rs1801133 SNPs and cognitive performance in long-term survivors of medulloblastoma. Procedure: Eighteen pediatric medulloblastoma survivors, on average 12.42 years post-diagnosis, completed the Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, California Verbal Learning Test Trial 1, and Auditory Consonant Trigrams tests. MTHFR SNPs were detected using whole genome sequencing data and custom scripts within R software. Results: Survivors with a rs1801131 SNP performed significantly worse on Digit Span Backward than survivors without this SNP exhibiting a large effect (p = 0.049; d = 0.95). Survivors with a rs1801131 SNP performed worse on Digit Span Forward (d = 0.478) and the CVLT Trial 1 (d = 0.417) with medium effect sizes. In contrast to rs1801131, relationships were not identified between a rs1801133 SNP and these performance measures. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the potential links between MTHFR SNPs and cognitive outcomes following treatment in brain tumor survivors. The current findings establish a novel relationship between rs1801131 and working memory in medulloblastoma. Increases in homocysteine levels and oxidative damage from radiation may lead to adverse long-term outcomes. This establishes the need to look beyond leukemia and methotrexate treatment to consider the risk of MTHFR SNPs for medulloblastoma survivors.

The Neurological Predictor Scale Predicts Adaptive Functioning via Executive Dysfunction in Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumor.

OBJECTIVES: Survivors of childhood brain tumors experience neurological sequelae that disrupt everyday adaptive functioning (AF) skills. The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS), a cumulative measure of tumor treatments and sequelae, predicts cognitive outcomes, but findings on its relation to informant-reported executive dysfunction (ED) and AF are mixed. Given known effects of frontal-subcortical system disruptions on AF, this study assessed the NPS' relationship with AF as mediated by frontal systems dysfunction, measured by the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe). METHODS: 75 participants (Mage = 23.5, SDage = 4.5) were young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors at least 5 years past diagnosis. FrSBe and Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R), a measure of AF, were administered to informants. Parallel multiple mediator models included Apathy and ED as mediators, and age at diagnosis and time between diagnosis and assessment as covariates. RESULTS: More complex treatment and sequelae were correlated with poorer functioning. Mediation models were significant for all subscales: Motor Skills (MS), p = .0001; Social Communication (SC), p = .002; Personal Living (PL), p = .004; Community Living (CL), p = .007. The indirect effect of ED on SC and CL was significant; the indirect effect of Apathy was not significant for any subscales. CONCLUSIONS: More complex tumor treatment and sequelae were associated with poorer long-term AF via increased ED. Cognitive rehabilitation programs may focus on the role of executive function and initiation that contribute to AF, particularly SC and CL skills, to help survivors achieve comparable levels of independence in everyday function as their peers.

GSTP1 polymorphisms sex-specific association with verbal intelligence in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma tumors.

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with a lower intellectual quotient (IQ) in medulloblastoma survivors. We investigated the association of GSTP1 polymorphisms with intellectual, neurocognitive skills (e.g., attention span, working memory, and processing speed), and adaptive outcomes for long-term pediatric medulloblastoma survivors. We hypothesized that genetic risk and sex-specific risk would contribute to significantly lower performances across all measures. Eighteen long-term pediatric medulloblastoma survivors completed the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale Intelligence, California Verbal Learning Test-II, Auditory Consonant Trigrams, and Oral Symbol Digit Modality Test. Informants were interviewed with the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R). After controlling for the false discovery rate, females with a polymorphism performed significantly worse than females without a polymorphism on verbal IQ (p = .005) and SIB-R (p = .012). There was a significant interaction between sex and polymorphism status for verbal IQ (b = -1.8, SE = 0.827, CI: -3.58, -.036). The main effect of this interaction was significant for females (p = .004) and not for males (p = .557). We found large effect sizes between males with the polymorphism and females with the polymorphism across measures of attention span (g = .877), working memory (g = 1.12), and processing speed (g = 1.53). Female medulloblastoma survivors with a GSTP1 polymorphism may have increased vulnerability to deficits in core cognitive skills, IQ, and everyday functional outcomes. Sex-specific genetic risk contributes to the variability in long-term verbal intelligence for medulloblastoma survivors.

Caregiver- and Clinician-Reported Adaptive Functioning in Rett Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Evaluation of Measurement Strategies.

Rett syndrome is the second most common cause of intellectual disability in females worldwide. The severity of many individuals' impairment limits the effectiveness of traditional assessment. However, clinician and parent reports of adaptive functioning may provide insight into these patients' abilities. This review aims to synthesize the current literature assessing adaptive functioning in Rett syndrome and evaluate existing measurement tools in this population. A search was conducted on PubMed using the search term "Rett syndrome." Studies that quantitatively assessed adaptive functioning outcomes in Rett syndrome with published and normed questionnaire measures were included. Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Overall results indicate that the population of people with Rett syndrome is highly impaired, both in overall adaptive functioning as well as in specific subdomains (e.g., mobility, activities of daily living). Atypical Rett syndrome groups performed better on measures of adaptive functioning relative to patients with classic Rett syndrome. Our findings identified measurement weaknesses, as many of the studies found floor effects and therefore were unable to capture meaningful variability in outcomes. Individuals with Rett syndrome are highly reliant on caregivers due to disrupted adaptive functioning abilities. Optimizing measurement of adaptive skills in Rett syndrome will facilitate the quantification of meaningful change in skills and the identification of efficacious interventions aimed at improving outcomes and quality of life.

Neurological predictor scale is associated with academic achievement outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood brain tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Survivors of childhood brain tumors exhibit impairments in academic performance and have lower rates of educational attainment compared to healthy same-aged peers. Prior research has demonstrated the concurrent validity of the Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS), a measure that incorporates tumor-related treatments and complications into one cumulative score, in predicting IQ, adaptive functioning, and core neurocognitive skills. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the NPS predicts academic achievement outcomes over and above the effects of individual treatment factors alone. METHODS: Sixty-two adult survivors completed four untimed measures of academic achievement from the Woodcock-Johnson III. RESULTS: NPS scores significantly predicted performance on all four academic measures: Letter Word ID (R2 = - 0.454, p < .01), Calculation (R2 = - 0.494, p < .01), Spelling (R2 = - 0.428, p < .01) and Passage Comprehension (R2 = - 0.447, p < .01). 16% of survivors were impaired on the Letter Word ID, 23% on Calculation, 19% on Spelling, and 11% on Passage Comprehension subtests with impairment defined as z ≤ - 1.5. The NPS predicted academic outcomes over and above chemotherapy, surgery, seizure medication, endocrine dysfunction, hydrocephalus, and radiation on all measures. CONCLUSION: This study extends prior research by demonstrating that the NPS is significantly associated with academic achievement in survivors on average 15.9 years after diagnosis. The NPS may be especially helpful in clinical research when studies lack the statistical power to investigate how treatments and neurological conditions individually contribute to outcomes.